Skip to content
← MAP Growth

How can we improve MAP Growth?

MAP Growth: Other

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

(thinking…)

I am an avid user of the learning continuum.

At our schools, we are avid users of the learning continuum. We use this to differentiate and plan our lessons accordingly. When the students were placed next to the standard they needed "next" it was a quick and easy way to make plans to match their instructional needs. Now that this feature is gone and "updated" I (we) are literally panicking! We are so upset! HA! The learning continuum before was "hard" to read (I wish we could have just printed the standard we were working on), but NOW it is not user friendly. Not only are the students names missing by their RIT level, but the scrolling is not user friendly. I'm saying all of this with love and as a suggestion, but we sure are upset at our school! :(

77 votes

We're glad you're here

Please sign in to leave feedback
Signed in as (Sign out)
Close
Close

We’ll send you updates on this idea

Carrie Poss shared this idea  ·   ·  Report…  ·  Admin →
How important is this to you?

We're glad you're here

Please sign in to leave feedback
Signed in as (Sign out)
Close
Close

We're glad you're here

Please sign in to leave feedback
Signed in as (Sign out)
Close
Close
Submitting...
An error occurred while saving the comment
  • Allison Benner commented  ·   ·  Report

    I completely agree, this new feature adds an additional step for planning instruction related to student needs. The old learning continuum grouped students into their RIT band and explicitly stated the skills they were ready to learn. Not including student names into each RIT band within the standard makes it so much harder and time consuming to plan and try to improve their skills. Please bring this feature back!